Now independent as Visit Earendil

Tamper-response forcompute accelerators

This work was done at Atlas Computing, Atlas Ignota’s predecessor organization.

Lifecycle
Independent
Pillar
Directability
Category
Bounded reach; Hardware security
01

The gap

To prevent unauthorized data access, you can add failsafe mechanisms to your hardware to wipe sensitive data upon detecting tampering. However, if you want to prevent unauthorized use of the chips themselves (say, to prevent unmonitored, dangerous AI workloads), you need a tamper response mechanism to make physical modification of the chips prohibitively costly.

02

We noticed

Existing hardware security efforts (specifically in the Survival and Flourishing Fund’s FlexHEG RFP) assumed such a tamper mechanism could exist, but no one had one or was actively working to create one.

04

What we did

The Atlas Computing team convinced Mehmet Sencan Mehmet Sencan CEO, EARENDIL LinkedIn of both the importance of the problem and viability of the solution direction, leading to him applying and receiving over a million dollars in combined grants from the SFF RFP.

05

The handoff

Mehmet, in his LLC, has iterated on designs for tamper-responsive heatsinks, decreasing cost and risks of injury while increasing reliability, yielding the SquibSink, which he will soon be licensed to sell easily to customers (similar to car steering wheels, which, because of their airbags, are labeled as “products containing dangerous goods”).

06

Since then

A tamper-response mechanism no one was building now exists as a working product — ready and awaiting the demand for it.

Proud to be part of the Convergent Research ecosystem